Eureka AirSpeed Vacuum is a Great Buy

Eureka AirSpeed Vacuum is a Great Buy Compared to the Dyson Animal Vacuum

Hey, when I am not underwater, I have to do housework once in a while just like any other guy with a wife or girlfriend!  So here goes:

I bought one of these Eureka AirSpeed Vacuums on Woot for $75. This vacuum cleaner is awesome. The suction is very powerful and this works great on bare floors or deep carpet. We have two Labrador retrievers, so sucking up their fur is important, and this vacuum sucks up just about all of their hair even in the deep carpet.

This vacuum also includes accessories that can attach to the hose so that you can clean things like the inside of your car. Again, this is important since we have dogs and need to clean out small spaces in our cars. The Eureka has an attachment used to clean stairs, which is handheld, about 4 inches wide, and has brushes that spin when attached. This spinning brush roll works great to get fur out of our car, in tight spaces. The Eureka also has (which I would think would be standard), a way to store the power cord just by touching a button and feeding the cord into a hidden spool inside the machine.

I also have a Dyson Animal vacuum cleaner (purchased for $300 on woot). The Dyson has about the same suction, but it does not have a way to store the power cord on a spool. Setting up the Dyson so I can clean my car involves taking a bunch of parts together. It's always a hassle because of the weird design, where I have to figure out the design all over again every time. After vacuuming, putting the Dyson back together for storage is also a hassle, as I have to laboriously put the parts back together. Having to manually put the cord back on the vacuum is especially irritating. Finally, the brush roll on the Dyson Animal is useless!  I can clean my car with the Dyson using another attachment, which works pretty well. 

I'd buy the Eureka over the Dyson again in a heartbeat. The Eureka seems to be as well made, and it performs better than the Dyson. Finally, the Eureka is only 25% of the price of the Dyson! Why buy a Dyson?  I give credit to Dyson for re-inventing the vacuum cleaner, but I don't understand why they are so much more expensive than other machines.  Maybe patent law has not protected Dyson's innovations enough, but I will leave that to the marketplace.

Solving a Problem: Portable Tire Inflators Blowing Car Fuses

OK, this post is a bit off-topic, but here goes.  Hopefully this might help out folks who have had the same problem.

I have bought about four different tire inflators over the years--$50 Slime and Vi-Air inflators, and a $20 Campbell-Hausfield inflator. 

I bought the more expensive Slime and Vi-air inflators, hoping to buy more durable ones that would last a long time and were of better quality than the cheap ones I've had in the past.  Both of these inflators works well but they both blow the fuses of all my cars -- a 2006 Ford E-150 van, Dodge Caravan, and Honda Odyssey.  The thing that I don't understand is that there is a fuse in the power cord of the inflator.  Theoretically this fuse should blow before the ones in my car (which are rated at 20 amps!), but the Vi-Air and Slime inflators both blow the fuses in my cars, and it is a hassle to replace the fuses. 

 I solved this problem by buying an adapter that I can clamp  directly to my car battery.  This adapter has a cigarette lighter female socket on the other end, so it supplies power directly from my car battery to the tire inflator.  I have had no problems with blown fuses, whether in the car or in the inflator, since using the car battery directly.  

 I have a cheaper Campbell-Hausfield inflator that is much louder and slower to inflate, but it has never blown a fuse in my car.  

 

Notes on Polecams

> I am sorry to bother you but I have a task at work it reminded me of a
> camera setup you used to shoot beneath the ice. You showed video at Sea
> Space in Houston TX that you shot from above the ice sort of with a pole
> cam?
>
> I need an underwater camera with a cabled above water video display.
>
> Any idea where to buy one?
>
> Thanks
>
> Bill


Hi Bill:

Are you shooting video or stills? 

I shot my polecam stuff in Antarctica with a huge HDCAM camera, the Sony HDCAM F900.  I had a standard Sony viewfinder taken apart and put in cylindrical, waterproof tube so that I could shoot the HDCAM with the monitor on the top of the housing.  It was attached to the housing with a short 30-pin Impulse cable.  I then bought a longer Impulse cable (at a cost of about $1500 just for the cable) that let me take that usual viewfinder and view it from six feet away.  I mounted the HDCAM housing on a PVC pole with a wood broomstick inside for stiffness. 

But that was 12 years ago. 

Today, I'd use a DSLR in a housing like the Canon 7D and Nauticam DP-4 monitor housing.   I have a review of the Nauticam monitor at:

http://norbertwu.blogspot.com/2012_02_01_archive.html

All you'd need to do is set the video rolling and get a cable from the monitor to the housing that is long enough.  Taking stills would be a bit more work. 


I also see that  Seacam have a polecam:
http://www.seacamusa.com/polecam-instructions.shtml

I have found that taking video is easier than taking good stills with a polecam.  And keeping your gear as simple as possible is also important.  For a lot of big subjects, you may not even need a monitor to see exactly what the camera sees -- just put a video camera and wide lens in the water, and you will soon be be to guesstimate the view that you are capturing. 





I hope that this helps. 
Best,
Norb

Thumbs down to Melbourne, Australia, Airport

Thumbs down to Melbourne, Australia, airport --

I loved traveling around the Melbourne, Victoria, Australia area.  Highlights included driving The Great Ocean Road and visiting the national parks The Grampians and Great Fern Park.  The Melbourne area itself is huge and congested; kind of like driving through the San Francisco Bay Area.  Wonderful place. 

However, traveling through the Melbourne Airport was a pain in the butt, worse than just about every other airport I've been through in the past 20 years of traveling.  


Surprisingly this progressive city's international and domestic airport does not offer free public wifi!  Most people traveling internationally will need wifi in order to check emails or notices about late flights, etc.   
 
The lines through security and passport control were horrific (LAX and Miami are the only ones worse in my memory), and security was stricter than any other place I've traveled through.   I had to wait about an hour to get through passport control and through security. 

Airport security confiscated a set of small tools that every other airport has allowed.  I particularly liked the provincial comment by one security agent.  I told her that I had traveled recently through Sydney Airport with the same small tools that she was confiscating.  She snorted in derision and said “Sydney!”.  It was incredibly unprofessional and amusing at the same time to hear out loud the competition between these two great cities of Australia.  

Oh, and they were very confusing about when you needed to show your passport or not, and would yell at you if you did or did not have your passport immediately handy.  When are airports (including domestic US airports) going to come up with a consistent set of rules as to whether you need to carry your ID and boarding pass through all of security, or not?  Some airports scream at you if you start walking through the metal detector with a boarding pass in your had.  Other airports require you to have a boarding pass.  And why do some airports make you show your boarding pass about twelve times.  Once or twice should be enough, particularly since boarding passes are so easily counterfeited.  

Q and A: compressing video for email and the web

Here’s a question and answer about compressing video for email and the web:

> Norb:

>

> You sent a shot of a jawfish with eggs last month.  What compression settings did you 

>  use?  I thought it looked pretty good and it downloaded almost immediately.

Answer:

Have you used MPEG Streamclip?  I find it awesome and simple, but not a highly talked about program for some reason.

I trimmed the jawfish shot in MPEG Streamclip, then put it through FCP Color Correction, then converted the resulting Quicktime HD file using MPEG Streamclip to .mp4 file.

You know you can cmd-I (Get Info) on a video file, and it will pull up an info window?  I attach the info window for the file I sent you.  I had MPEG Streamclip convert the 1080p file from FCP to 640 x 360 mpeg-4.

I attach a screengrab of the settings from MPEG Streamclip.  I chose FILE-->EXPORT TO MPEG-4, then in the resulting window chose Other (640 x 360 -- this was not a choice originally, and that was it.  The Frame Size choices may have been different and I believe change according to what you are working on.  I just dragged the finished video into the program as an example and I believe it filled in the 640 x 360 fields, which were not there before.

 

I hope that this helps.  

 

Norb

Choosing the Best Bags for Air Travel: Tips to Help Reduce Excess Baggage Fees When Traveling

I traveled through Australia and Indonesia back in February for an underwater shoot.  I had so much fun (and the fare from Australia to Bali/Jakarta was so inexpensive), that I decided to repeat the trip with my old friend, Andy Day, as a working vacation.  Andy and I have been friends since the second grade, and we grew up hunting snakes in the woods of Atlanta, Georgia.  We’ve since traveled to numerous places in pursuit of wildlife photographs.  I am the underwater and photography expert, and Andy is a bird and reptile expert, so he shows me things in the topside world that I would never otherwise see or know about. 

One of my biggest concerns when traveling overseas is how much I will be charged for my baggage.  As an underwater photographer, I travel with a lot of gear.  I brought an absolute minimum of gear on this trip, but it still amounted to three large bags at 50 pounds each.  I attach a list at the end of this blog that describes what I put in my bags. 

Traveling by airline in Australia is always especially worrisome, since airlines there, especially Qantas, are legendary for their strict baggage policies, and the exorbitant rates that they charge for excess baggage. 

I’ll describe some of the tips I’ve learned over the years to keep my baggage charges to a minimum. 

1.  Use an airline-affiliated credit card that gives you free bags. 

I applied for a Continental Airlines Presidential Plus Mastercard for the first time this year.  This card has since been replaced by the United MileagePlus Club Card.  Both of these credit cards offer cardholders two free checked bags for free.  They also give the cardholder membership in United’s airport clubs, which is a $475 value.  I paid the annual fee of $395 for this card, the first time I’ve ever decided to pay so much for a card.  Chase does offer another United card that costs only $95 per year and gives one checked bag for free. 

This card offers good value for the $395 fee, although I will be evaluating the fee each year.  Beyond the free checked bags and United Club access, the card does not charge foreign transaction fees.  This means that if I charge a meal or hotel room on the card in Australia, I won’t get hit with the 2% to 3% foreign transaction fee that other credit cards apply to purchases.  This can be a pretty big savings also.  I use this card (along with a no-annual-fee Capital One credit card that also does not charge foreign transaction fees) exclusively when traveling outside of the US. 

Many other airlines, such as American, have partnered with credit card companies to offer credit cards with similar benefits.  I also have a Citibank credit card that gives me one free bag on American Airlines, and has a $95 annual fee that was waived for my first year.  Often, credit card companies will waive or discount annual fees for good customers who ask. 

2.  Try to attain “elite status” on a preferred airline. 

United Airlines, which I prefer to use for most travel, allows its “elite flyers”-- those customers who fly over 25,000 miles per year on United and its partner airlines, to check in two bags at 50 pounds for free on international flights.  I would also get these two bags for free since I carry the Continental Presidential Plus credit card.  Almost every airline has programs for loyal travelers that give a host of perks when a customer flies over a certain threshold per year.  Among those perks are free checked bags. 

3.  Research what luggage best meets your needs and is also lightweight and flexible. 

When I started out as an underwater photographer, I was always allowed two bags at 70 pounds for free, when traveling internationally.  Now, the standard is two bags at 50 pound for free for international travel, with a charge for the third bag.  No matter how much I try, I still have about 140 pounds of gear including the weight of the bags themselves. 

What’s the solution?  I use flexible packing.  For my two main bags, I use Eagle Creek ORV Super Trunks, which are rolling duffel bags.  These bags carry an enormous amount of gear (their capacity is about 8500 cubic inches) and weigh only 12 to 13 pounds.  These bags have a main compartment for my diving gear and things like clothes, wetsuits, tripods, and smaller cases containing underwater housings and camera gear.  They have three smaller pockets on top which I use to store receipts, sandals, socks, insect repellant, sunscreen, and other smaller items that I may need to get at frequently. 

I’ll pack my two Eagle Creek rolling duffels to the 50 pound limit, then bring fairly lightweight items like a rain jacket, towels, a Scottevest vest, and sweatpants in a separate large duffel bag (no wheels or structure to this bag).  Many times, when I arrive at an airport, the airline agent will be pleased to see that I have packed two bags right at the 50-pound limit, and that I am knowledgeable and polite about the airline’s baggage policies.  Since I have both a credit card allowing me two bags, and I am also an elite member of the airline, the agent will more often that not let me check this duffel bag at no charge. 

If, however, the agent is a stickler and wishes to charge me for this third bag, then I have the following plan if the excess baggage fee is outrageous.  I’ve never had to do this, but it’s my last option.  I will take out the Scottevest vest, which has 24 hidden pockets.  I’ll repack quickly right at the ticket counter, taking out what small, heavy items (such as dive regulators, camera bodies, lenses) I can from the Eagle Creek rolling duffels and putting them in the vest or my carry-on bags (more on these bags in a minute).  Because the duffel is just a bag with no hard sides or wheels, I can completely empty this bag, then stuff it and all its contents into my two big rolling duffels, while placing small, dense items in my carry-on luggage or Scottevest. 

Please note that you should NOT try to carry on any tools, pocketknives, too many batteries, or any items that could be construed or used as a weapon, like a tripod. 

4.  Chooose Carry-on Baggage That Can Carry a Lot of Gear. 

I’ve probably spent more time researching the best carryon bags for my needs than anything else.  I’ve settled on several products from Lowepro that are superbly designed for carrying my gear on the plane.  I’ve used these bags from Lowepro to decrease my excess baggage costs and to travel efficiently.  Here’s a list of what I carry on the plane:

Lowepro Pro Roller Lite 250AW (Black): my primary wheeled carry-on bag.  

Lowepro Magnum 200 AW: a shoulder bag that has a luggage sleeve, allowing it to be carried easily and efficiently on top of the Pro Roller Lite. 

Lowepro Vertex 300AW camera backpack, to replace the backpack that I normally carry for my errands around town. 

A.  Lowepro Pro Roller Lite 250 AW

I’ve previously written about the Lowepro Pro Roller Lite 250 AW, which has become my primary and favorite wheeled carry-on bag.  The Pro Roller Lite 250 AW is a rolling case that contains Lowepro’s usual fabulous set of padded dividers, which let you organize, pad, and separate all your gear. Unlike earlier Pro Rollers, this model has the padded dividers within the case itself, rather than in a separate bag that fits within the rolling case. I prefer this, as space is at an absolute premium when traveling by air today. I used the dividers to separate, pad, and divide my larger and heavier items. 

You can see my review here:

http://norbertwu.blogspot.com/2012/03/review-of-lowepro-pro-roller-lite-250.html

 

I love the thoughtful and extremely convenient touches that Lowepro puts into its products.  For instance, the Pro Roller Lite 250 AW has a small plastic “bucket” on the bottom of the bag.  This makes picking up the case very easy and convenient.  I also love the elastic pocket on the top flap of the roller, which allows me to quickly access and store a laptop, ipad, magazines, even thick books. 

B.  Magnum 200 AW shoulder bag.

This bag is a great solution to the problems I’ve encountered with airline travel.  First, it is a perfect size for an outdoor and wildlife photographer --big enough to carry a completely topside camera kit -- camera body along with a wide zoom, telephoto zoom, and a flash unit.  It can carry all other kinds of things as well, since it has Lowepro’s famous dividing system and numerous pockets. 

One of the best features of this bag is the luggage or trolley sleeve on the back.  This sleeve allows the bag to fit snugly right over the handles of the Lowepro Pro Rollers and many other rolling carts.  Because both bags are black and look alike,, airline attendants have never bothered me about carrying on an extra bag (passengers normally are only allowed one carryon and one backpack or purse).  Once I am on location, this bag is perfect for having a topside camera kit ready to go, or fitted out for something else. 

C.  Vertex 300AW backpack:

I chose the Vertex 300AW to replace the backpack that I normally carry for my errands around town and have used for air travel in the past.  My normal backpack, although large, is not anywhere near as large as the Vertex 300AW, which is a bag made to carry a camera with lenses and accessories, along with a 17" notebook computer. 

The advantages of the Vertex 300AW is that it, too, contains Lowepro’s custom-divider solution.  I carried camera gear, hard drives, and even swimming trunks (I use running shorts) and a complete change of clothing in this capacious backpack.  I was able to put in my usual notebook of papers along with my MacBook Pro laptop in the laptop compartment.  The Vertex also has two nice “side” pockets on the front, which I used to put in a few toiletries like a toothbrush. 

There are other camera backpacks like the Vertex 300AW out there.  However, for the light weight and sturdy construction, no other backpack comes close.  The Vertex 300AW has a professional harness system that took all the weight off my shoulders, unlike the flimsy and thin straps that some other backpacks feature.  It was a pleasure to wear, especially on those long hikes through an airport from the departure gate to customs and beyond, before airports provide carts.  Why ARE all those hikes over 2 miles? 

The only disadvantage of the Vertex 300AW is that it is too high to fit underneath an airline seat.  Since I often come onto flights swaddled with many bags, it is important that I board the plane early, before all the overhead compartments are taken.  Sorry, that’s life as a photographer.  I do wish that the Vertex had a third and larger pocket after the laptop pocket, as having a third and larger pocket would let me store things like guidebooks and an iPad.  The present laptop compartment is just wide enough for a laptop and can fit very little more.  Having just one more, thicker pocket would make this backpack into a real all-around traveling and photography pack. 

Here’s a fairly complete list of what I put in my carry-on bags:

In my Pro Roller and Vertex 300:

Tickets

Passport

Visas

Cash (in small bills)

American and United frequent flyer cards

MacBook Pro laptop computer with AC power supply

VGA and HDMI adapters for MacBook Pro for presentations

Two-prong (Panasonic-type) AC power cord

Cell phone and charger

Portable hard drives

Memory cards in Lowepro card case

Media or PC card reader with USB2.0 cord

Small inverter for using computer on airplanes and in cars

two mesh pocket cases containing all kinds of computer cables

Cradlepoint wifi router and USB data modem

Garmin GPS loaded with maps for places I am traveling to

one topside camera body (currently Canon 7D or Nikon D800)

wide-angle zoom lens

telephoto zoom lens

set of shorts, swimming trunks, light long pants, and T-shirt (if stranded)

shaving kit with toothbrush, etc in case I am stranded

swim goggles

Ear plugs

eardrops to ward off ear infections

medicine for seasickness

large and small ziploc bags

Pepperidge Farm Geneva cookies or Snickers bars in case plane is stuck for hours

Postcards to give to "grease the wheels" at airline counters

Business cards

Sunglasses

Novels

 ipad loaded with e-books

 airline baggage policies to challenge excess baggage charges

small flashlight

underwater video light heads

If forced to, I will carry denser, heavy items like Scuba dive gauges and underwater photo gear, but I try to remember NOT to hand-carry anything sharp, any batteries or items that could be rejected (and therefore lost for the trip) by airport security.

Booking.com is a great site for booking hotels worldwide

 I’ve been traveling and shooting wildlife and scenery in Victoria, Australia.  We (my friend from grade school whom I used to hunt snakes with, Andy Day and I) flew into Melbourne, the second largest city in Australia.  Melbourne is a big city, population 4.1 million. 

I’ll be posting photos from this shoot shortly, but first, I’d like to give a big kudos to the website booking.com.  I use this site to book hotels where I am traveling, and it is a good one.  It represents a wide range of hotels and offers reviews from people who have booked accommodations on its site.  ONLY customers of a particular hotel can leave reviews, so this means that the reviews are more “real” than other sites. 

The reviews are supposedly never edited.  They do need approval by booking.com staff (or robots); and you have to wait for booking.com to send you a link by email before you can leave a review.  I’ve left a few reviews now on booking.com; and they have not been edited or filtered out, something which disturbs me greatly about the website yelp.com. 

The best thing about booking.com’s site is the map.  If you are in a huge city like Melbourne, but just want to see all the hotels in your location, then you can simply point to your location on their map and see all the available hotels.  I wish that other websites had this very useful mapping feature.